Who Are Qadyane’s

Most Of The Articles Are Written By

Maulana Yousuf Ludyanvi Rahmatullah Alaihi

 

Contents:-

 

1) What does Quran Say About the Finality of Prophet Hood(S.A.W).

2) Finality of Prophet(S.A.W) in the light of Ahadiht’s.

3) What is Qadyanism.

4) Ahmedi or Qadyani.

5) Qadyani Debase the Islamic Kalimah.

6) Difference Between Qadyani and Muslims.

7) Character of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadyani.

8) Could He be a Prophet.

9) Message to Muslim Ummah.

10) Identification of Promised Messiah.

11) Identification of Imam Mahdi.

12) Final Rejoinder of Mirza Tahir.

13) Dr. Abdul Salam and His Nobel Prize.

14) The Qadyani Funeral.

15) Reply to Mirza Tahir Challenge

16) Two Interesting Mubahalas.

17) Verdicts on Qadyanis.

18) Maloon Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadyani in the mirror of his own Writings.

 

WHAT DOES THE HOLY QURAN SAY ABOUT FINALITY OF PROPHETHOOD

The holy Quran and the holy Prophet's Ahadith (Traditions) eloquently prove that prophethood ('nubuwwat' and 'risalat') came to an end with our Prophet Muhammad (SAW). There are decisive verses to that effect. Being the last Prophet in the chain of prophethood no one ever shall now succeed him to that status or dignity

"Muhammad is not the father of any man among you, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets; and Allah (SWT) is Aware of all things." (Quran. AI-Ahzab 33:40). INTERPRETATION OF THE HOLY QURAN All the interpreters of the Holy Quran agree on the meaning of 'Khatam-un-Nabieen' that our Prophet (SAW) was the last of all the prophets and none shall he exalted to the lofty position of prophethood after him.

A. By Imam Hafiz Ibn-e-Khateer

His explanatory remarks on the above verse are as follows: "This verse is conclusive of the precept that our Prophet is the last prophet and that there shall be no `nabi' after him. When there shall be no 'nabi' to follow him the ordainment of a `rasool' cannot arise by logic of anteriority because the status of a `rasool' is more exclusive than that of a `nabi'. Every `rasool' is a `nabi' but every `nabi' is not a `rasool'. There exists a continuous and unbroken chain of citations of Ahadith from a large number of venerable `sahabah' or Companions of the Prophet (Allah be pleased with them), that, there shall be no 'nabi' or `rasool' after Muhammad." (Tafseer Ibn-e-Khateer, Vol.3)

 

B. By Imam Qartabi

Imam Qartabi comments on the quoted verse as follows: "Said Iben-e-Atiya that the words (Khatam-un-Nabieen) according to the learned men of the Ummah of the present and the past indicate perfect comprehensiveness and signify, in consonance with the Quranic injunction, that there shall be no Prophet after Muhammad (SAW)."

C. Hujjat ul Islam Imam Ghazali

Hujjat ul Islam, Imam Ghazali explains the said verse in these words: "No doubt the Ummah has unanimously understood from this word (Khatam-un-Nabieen) and its circumstantial reference to mean non-existence of a `nabi' or `rasool' ever after Muhammad (SAW) and that (this word calls for) no reservation or tacit interpretation in it; hence its dissident is certainly the one who rejects (ummah's) unanimity." (Al Iqtisad fil Etiqad, p.123)

 

THE BELIEF

OF

KHATME NUBUWWAT

(FINALIY OF PROPHETHOOD)

In Light of Hadiths

 

ALLAH (The Creator) began the system of guidence to humanity through His venerewbal Messengers and Prophet hood beginning with Hazarat ADAM (Peace be upon him), and finaly ending with the last prophet of all time Hazarat Muhammed (sal;l Alaho Alayhi Wassalam). There after no new phrophet is to be.

All types of nubuwwat is closed eg, ZILLI, Burozi, Tashreri, or non-Tashrehi. Similarly, the revelation through prophethood is also closed after Hazarat Muhammed (S A W),and likewise any revelation through which the reformation of ISLAM is claimed. The Quraan is the last complete and most perfect book of revelation ,which is unalterable. The contents of this book are safegaurded by ALLAH himself.

It is the unanimous decision by evidence of countless Quranic revelations and hundreds of Ahadith of the phrophet Muhammed (S A W), the concencues of sahabas (ALLAH be pleased with them ) and the Ulemas and intellectual scholers that MUHAMMED (S A W) is the last phrophet and messenger of ALLAH, this Shariat is the last Shariat,this ummah is the last ummah.

The above mentioned statements and their beliefs and admission by heart are the eessential elements of faith in ISLAAM.In ISLAAM this faith is called the faith of Khatme Nubuwwat.It is the concecus of the muslim Ummah that after MUHAMMED (S A W) , any person who claims to be a phrophet and claims to be a mesenger is a KAZZAB(liar) and Dajjal(deciever),is an imposter and false. He has no relation with ISLAAM , similarly a beliver of such a liar also becomed Kafir (non-believer).

Here are some references from Quraan and Ahadith relatied to prophet MUHAMMED (S A W) being the KHATEM UN NABIYEEN.(finality of prophethood)

References From Quraan

"MUHAMMED is not the the father of any man among you, but is the messenger of ALLAH and is the seal on the prophets ;and ALLAH is aware of all things."

(Para 21 Sur Al Ahzab 33-40)

"This day,I have perfected your faith and completed all my favours upon you; and have chosen ISLAAM for you as your religion"

(Para 6 Sur Madia 5)

REFERENCES FROM AHADITH

Hazarat abu Hurairah (ALLAH be pleased with him) narrated that ALLAH's messenger (S A W) said ; " Certainly my example and the example of prophets earlier than me is like the example of a palace most elagently and most beautifully constructed by a person except (that he left inb it ) a (space) for a brick in one of its corner and that made the people (who were) going around it wonder (at its beauty) and exclaime ( in perplexition) why is there no brick inlaid here ? the Phrophet (S A W) ; I am that (corners last ) brick and i am the last of the phrophets ".

(Shahih al Bukhari,book Al Munaqib,Chapter 3 Khatem un nabiyeen p501 vol 1)

Its narated by Hazarat Tahuban (ALLAH be pleased withe him) that our phrophet (S A W) said ; "In my UMMAH there shall arise thirty liars ,each of them will pretend that he is a phrophet, but I am the last of the prophets ; there is no prophet after me".

(Abu Dawood Vol . 2 p.228,Tirimizi Vol 2 p.45 )

Hazarat Ibne Masood (ALLAH de pleased with him ) has narrated that the prophet (S A W) said ; "The doomsday would not happen until 30 Kazzabbs (liars) have arisen all who claim to be prophets Although I am last of the prophets and their is none after me"

(Muslim Sharif Tirimizi Sharif & Abu Dawood Sharif)

There are so many proofs for MUHAMMAD (S A W) , the mesenger of ALLAH to establish the last prophet that it is imposible to write them here. During the last 14 years thousands of books have been published where in such postive proofs are cited that no sensible person dare refute or reject them.

Prophet MUHAMMAD (S A W) said that " I am the last prophet there is no prophet after me " and instantly warned his UMMAH that there would be liars claiming prophethood. The muslim UMMAH not only strongly refuted pretensions of such liars , but sacraficed their lives for the protection and honour of KHATUM UN NABIYEEN. Here are some events of the past.

ASWAD ANSI

Aswad ansi was a resident of Yemen. He claimed prophethood during the ilustrious lifetime of MUHAMMAD (S A W). he marched on to conqur NAJRAN in the first instance; then turned towards SANIA. Then all Yemen came into his suzerainity. It became known that most of Yemen had become infidels and accepted the faith of Aswad's prophethood. Prophet MUHAMMAD (S A W) despatched a memorandum to the Yermnies , who rejected the faith of Aswad's prophethood to execute Aswad.

Feroze Daleemi , one of the most prominent sahabas defeated and executed Aswad in his historical conquest. Prophet MUHAMMAD (S A W) had recieved the news of Aswad's execution through revelation. The Yemnies Had sent a messenger to prophet MUHAMMED (S A W) with news of Aswad's execution in compliance with orders; but the prophet MUHAMMED (S A W) passed away before the messenger could reach Madinah.

MUSSELIMA KAZZAB

Musselimah was a resident of Yamamah. He claimed prophethood before the demise of the prophet MUHAMMED (S A W). People in large numbers became infidels, and supporters of Musselima. The battel of Yamamah took place during the caliphate of Hazarat Abu Bakar Siddique (may ALLAH be pleased with him) . in this battel Musselimah Kazzab was condemed to hell.His 20,000 followers died as well. In this battle just over 1,200 sahabas , including Hayffaz and those who had participated in the battle of Badr , were amongst the mayters, and in this way the revolt came to its inevittable end.

MIRZA GHULAM AHMED QADIANI

A resident of qadiyan, which is a town in Punjab (presently in Indian part of Punjab), Mirza Ghulam Ahmed claimed prophethood in 1901 during the British rule in India. He fell victim to cholera, an epidemic desiese and died ignomiously in Lahore Pakistan. His infidel belifes had a short list. Since then all the ULEMAS have excluded him and his followers from the fold of ISLAAM . The deseaced Mirza Qadiani's first sucsessor is Khalifa Hakim Noor Ud Din, second Mirza Mahmood third is Mirza Nasir, and fourth is Mirza Tahir residing in London in political asylem. All Qadianis are recognised and treated by the MUSLIM UMMAH asinfidels. In Pakistan all Qadianis had been officially declared as NON-MUSLIMS in 1974. Subsequently in 1984 an anti Qadiani ORDINANCE was enforced as a result of which Mirza Tahir fled from Pakistan and sought refuge in England and resides in London. Qadianis regard them selves as a group of Muslims. They engage them selves in activites with the profile of ISLAAM by which some ignorant and simple Muslims become victems of their deception. All Muslims need to be aware of their machinations in religious or other social engagements.

 

WHAT IS QADIANISM?

By

 Maulana Muhammad Saleem Dohrat

QADIYANISAM.....

 

....dishounours ALLAH (SWT), the creator

Where can the human escape from that being in whose hands is every atom. He says: I will come seceretly like theives.

(Roohani Khazaa'in Page 39, Vol. 20)

..claims divinity for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.

I (Mirza) saw in a dream that I am God. I have belived that I am God.
(Rohanni Khazaa'in Page 564, Vol 5)

...teaches that the door of prophethood is open, even after the final prophet Muhammad (SAW)

This fact is established like the day that the door of prophethood is open after prophet Muhammad (S A W)
(Haqeeqatun Nubuwah Page 228)

...debases the greatest of all Prophets, Muhammad (SAW)

Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and his sahabah (RAA) used to eat cheese made by the christians, although it was well known that pig's fat was used in its making.
(Al Fadhal, Qadiyaan 22nd Febuary1924)

 

..claims that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is Muhammad! the messenger of Allah (SWT).

..Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard against the disbelivers and merciful amoungst themselves. In this divine revelation, I have been named Muhammad and also Rasool.
(Roohani Khazain Page 207, Vol 18)

One who differentiated between me and the Mustupha has neither seen me or recognised me.
(Roohani Khazain Page 258-259 Vol 16)

 

... Teaches that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed is superior to Prophet Muhammad (SAW)

 

..Muhammad has decended among us once again and he is more greater in status than ever before. Whosoever wants to see Muhammad (SAW) should see Ghulam Ahmad in Qadian.
(Badr, Qadiyan 25th october 1906)

...propogates that Mirza is superior to all the Prophets

And Allah (SWT) is showing so many signs for me that if they were shown in the time of Noah, those people would not have drowned .
(Rohhani Khazain Page 575 Vol 22)

Yousuf of this UMMAH, i.e this humble one is greater than Israeli yousuf.

(Rohhani Khazain page 99 Vol 21)

Although many prophets have come into this world, I am no less in knowledge and recognition of ALLAH than any of them.
(Rohhani Khazain Page 240 Vol 18)

Leave the mention of Ibne Maryam (Easaa Alaihe sallam); Ghulam Ahmad is better than him.
(Rohhani Khazain Page 240 Vol 18)

...teaches hatred towards Hazrat Easaa Alayhis sallam, one of the greatest prophets of ALLAH

 

(Jesus) had the habit of uttering obscenities and frequently using foul language.
(Rohhani Khazain Page 289 Vol 11)

It should be remembered that he (Jesus) also had top some extent the habit of lying.
(Rohhani Khazain Page 289 Vol 11)

Jesus could not portray himself as a pious man because people know him as a gluttonus alcoholic.

(Rohhani Khazain Page 296 Vol 10)

 

Ahmadi or Qadiani

The followers of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian are Qadiani whether they belong to the Qadiani jamaat of Rabwah or the Lahori jamaat of Qadianis. But they call themselves "Ahmadi" pleading that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad befits the verse "Asmahu Ahmad" in the holy Quran whereas according to the muslims this quranic verse relates to the holy prophet Muhammad (SAW).

Taking undue advantage of the word, Ahmad in his name Mirza Ghulam Ahmad twisted the meaning of the above verse in his favour and claimed prophethood on this basis, though his name actually means, "slave of Ahmad". According to the Holy Quran both Ahmad and Muhammad are the holy name of our Prophet (SAW)

Therefore, the application of the said Quranic verse to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian is a deliberate alteration of the Holy Quran. On this basis calling Qadianis as Ahmadis is "harram" (forbidden) and unlawful.

QADIANIS DEBASE THE ISLAMIC KALIMAH

This article draws special attention of the reader to the fact that the Qadianis deem Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a Prophet incarnate through reincarnation, ie rebirth of the holy Prophet of Islam in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's person. Thus they have rebelled against Islam and seceded from it. They have infactgiven the pretender a place higher than that of the holy Prophet (SAW).

The contents of this text are based on authenic Qadiani literature with references to the relevant book and page. We take full responsibility and do hereby declare that the sources are authentic and correct.

To Qadianis Muhammad (SAW) is Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Himself

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claims that he himself is (na-auzoo-billah) Muhammad (SAW):
Muhammad is the apostle of Allah. and those who are with him are strong against Unbelievers, (but) compassionate amongst each other. (HQ 48.29)
Mirza said, "In this divine revelation (the above verse) I have been named Muhammad as well as the Messenger of Allah". (Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, p.3;Roohani Khazain vol.18, p.207).

The So-Called Two Prophetic Appointments Of Muhammad (SAW)

The reasons why the Qadianis deem Mirza to be Muhammad (SAW) is that according to the Qadiani belief, `Khatam un Nabieen' (the final Prophet (SAW)) had been ordained to be born in Mecca as Muhammad. For the second time, according to the Qadianis, he was reincarnated in Qadian as Mirza Ghulam Ahmad ! In other words, the spirt of Muhammad (SAW) along with his prophetic accomplishments allegedly appeared a second tme in the incarnation of Mirza. And we quote:

"And know that just as our holy Prophet (SAW) was born in the 5th century, in the same way he was reborn in the end of 19th century in the incarnation of the Promised Masih" (Mirza). (khutbah-e-Ilhamiah,p.180; Roohani Khazain, vol.16,p270)
"The holy Prophet (SAW) had two births as a Prophet. In other words, we may say that it was promised that the holy Prophet (SAW) would be born in the world once and once more reincarnated and this was fulfilled by the incarnation of the promised Masih and the promised Mahdi" (Mirza). (Tuhfa-e-Golravia, p94; footnote, Roohani Khazian, vol.17,p.249)

Mirza of Qadian Claimed To Be The Same As Muhammad (SAW)

According to Qadiani belief Muhammad (SAW) with all his excellence was reincarnated in Mirza of Qadian. As such the entity of Mirza of Qadian is (na-uzoo-billah)the same as the entity of Muhammad (SAW). Mirza has said:

"And Allah bestowed upon me the bounty of the holy Prophet and made it perfect, and he drew towards me the kindness and generosity of that merciful Prophet, so much so that my entity became his entity. Thus he who joins my Jamaat really becomes one of the Sahaba of my chief who was better then all the Prophets. It is not hidden from those with the ability to think that this is what the words "others of them" mean. The person who makes a difference between me and Mustafa has neither seen me nor recoginised me". (Khutbah-e-Ilhamiah, p.171; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, pp.258-259).

Mirza of Qadian Claimed That He Posessed All The Virtues And Excellence Of Muhammad (SAW)

Once the belief had been fabricated that the being of Mirza is exactly the being of Muhammad (SAW) and that it is Muhammad (SAW) himself who was reincarnated in Qadian as Mirza, then it must also be alleged that all the accomplishments and distinctions of Muhammad (SAW) were transferred to Mirza. Mirza has said:
"When I am the holy Prophet incarnate and when all the accomplishments of Muhammad including the prophethood are reflected in my mirror of my shadiness, then who is the man who has claimed prophethood in a seperate being ?" (Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, p.8; Roohani Khazain, vol.18,p.212)
"The entity of the promised Masih (Mirza), in the sight of Allah is the entity of the holy Prophet (SAW). In other words, in the records of Allah there is no duality or difference between the promised Masih and the holy Prophet (SAW). Rather they both share the same eminence, the same rank, the same status and the same name. Although verbally they are two, yet in reality they are one and the same". (Al-Fazl, Qadian, Vol.3, No.37, dated 16th September 1915, as cited in Qadiani Mazhab page 207, 9th edition, Lahore)

Mirza Of Qadian Claimed That He Was The Final Prophet

According to the Qadiani belief, the "Qadiani based" birth of Muhammad (SAW) as a prophet took place in the incarnate AUTAR, Mirza of Qadian. And as he became incarnate of Muhammad (SAW) then Miraz becomes the "final prophet" too ! Mirza says:
I have told so many times that according to the verse: "And others of them.." I am incarnate the last of the Prophets. Twenty years ago Allah named me in Braheen-e-Ahamadia, Muhammad and AHmad and declared that I am the holy Prophets (SAW) incarnation. (Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, p.8; Roohani Khazain vol.18; p212)
"Blessed is he who has recognised me. Of all the paths to God I am the last path, and of all his Lights, I am the last Light. Unfortunate is he who forsakes me, because without me all is darkness". (Kashti-e-Nooh, p.56; Roohani Khazain, vol.19, p.61).

Mirza of Qadian Claimed He Was The Best Of The Prophets Of Allah

"Many thrones have descended from heaven but thy throne has been placed the highest". (Tazkirah 2nd Ed, p.643)

"The various accomplishments which were bestowed upon all other Prophets were concentrated in a greater degree in the holy Prophet. All those accomplishments have been conferred on me through the holy Prophets reincarnation in me. That is why I bear the names of Adam, Abraham, Moses, Noah, Solomon, Jesus, etc. Allthe previous Prophets were the incarnations of special attributes of the holy Prophet but I am the the reincarnation of all the attributes of the holy Prophet". (Malfoozat-e-Mirza, Vol.3, P.270)

Mirza of Qadian Claimed That He Was Superior To Muhammad (SAW)

The Qadianis believe that Mirzas reincarnation was superior to the Prophets first birth in Mecca. Mirza says:

One who denies that the orainment of the Prophet (SAW) is related to the 6th thousand as it was related to the 5th thousand, denies the truth and the mandate of the Quran. the truth is that the spirituality of the (reincarnated) holy Prophet at the end of the 6th thousand (ie these days), is much more stronger, more complete and severe than in those early years. rathe it is like the 14th (moonlit) night". (Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, p181; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, pp.271-272)

The Simile Of "The New Moon" Used For The Holy Prophet (SAW) And That Of "The Full Moon" Used For Mirza

The superiority of the Qadiani incarnation has been expressed in yet another style: viz. During the Meccan age the holy Prophet (SAW), Isalm was like the Crescent in which there is no light but in his so-called Qadiani reincarnation, Islam became lighted and illuminated like the full moon. Mirza said:
"And Islam started like the cescent which was destined ultimately to become in the later ages the full moon by the command of God. Thus Allahs wisdom willed that Islam should asume the form of the full moon in that century which sholud resemble the full moon by way of counting". (Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, p181; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, p.275)

"To declare those who denied the holy Prophet in his first birth as unbelievers and outside the fold of Islam, but to regard the deniers of his second birth as muslim is an insult to the Prophet and a joke against the signs of Allah, although the promised Masih has in Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, compared the mutual relation between the first and the second births of the holy Prophet to the relationship between the crescent and the full moon". (Akhbar Al-Fazl, Qadian, Vol.3, No.10, dated 15th July 1915 as cited in Qadiani Mazhab p262)

Greater Manifest Victory

In order to express the superiority of Mirza it was calimed that the manifest victory achieved by Mirza was greater then the manifest victory of the holy Prophet (SAW). Thus Mirza said
"It is apparent that the time of the manifest victory of the era of the holy Prophet has expired, and the second victory which was to be much greater and clearer then the first one had yet to be achieved. It ws ordained that its time should fall during the times of the promised Masih". (Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, pp193-194(Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, p.288)

SO-CALLED BEGINNING AND PERFECTION OF MIRZA'S SPIRITUAL EXCELLENCE

It was also claimed that the era of the Makki birth of the holy Prophet (SAW) was only the first step in his progress of spiritual attainments, whereas his Qadiani reincarnation represents the highest pinnacle of his spiritual development. Thus it is said:
"The spirituality of our holy Prophet (SAW) was conceived 5th thousand (ie Makki birth) with its precise attributes and that period was not the the climax of his spirituality's development. It was rather the first step to the highest pinnacle of its perfection. Thereafter this spirituality manifested itself in its full glamour during the 6th thousand [his rebirth in Qadian] at the present time". (Khutba-e-llhamiah, p177; Roohani Khazain, Vol.16, p.266)

THE SO CALLED SUPERIOR MENTAL DEVELOPMENT OF MIRZA

It is also claimed that the mental development of Mirza of Qadian was superior to that of the holy Prophet (SAW). Thus it is said:
"The mental development of the promised Masih (i.e. the Mirza of Qadian) was higher than that of the holy Prophet (SAW). And this is only a part of the superiority which the promised Masih has over the holy Prophet. The mental faculties of the holy Prophet could not manifest fully owing to the deficiency of civilization; although the ability existed. They have now manifested themselves fully through the promised Masih by virtue of the advancement of civilization." (Review, May 1929, as cited in Qadiani Mazhab, p.266, ninth edition. Lahore)

QADIANIS TERM REClTERS OF KALIMAH OF MUHAMMAD (SAW) AS KAFIR(!)

When it is admitted, according to the Qadiani belief, that the Qadiani Mirza is (God forbid) superior to Muhammad of Arabia (SAW) in dignity then it must also be necessary to believe that those who recite the Kalimah of Muhammad (SAW) are not Muslims. In other words. the Kalimae Tayyibah, (La Illaha Ill-lah, Muhammadur Rasoolullah), without belief in the Qadiani Mirza becomes false. Thus it is said:

"The point is now quite clear. If it is 'Kufr' to deny the gracious Prophet it must also be 'Kufr' to deny the promised Masih, because the promised Masih is in no way a separate being from the gracious Prophet; rather he is the same (Muhammad incarnate). If anyone is not deemed a Kaflr for denying the promised Masih, then anyone else who denies the gracious Prophet also cannot be considered a Kafir. How is it possible that denying him in his first birth as Prophet should be regarded as Kufr, but denying him in his (reincarnated) second birth as prophet should not be regarded as Kufr, when, as claimed by the promised Masih, his (Mirza's as Muhammad incarnate) spiritual attainment is stronger, complete and severe." (Kalimatul Fasl, pages 146-147, as cited in the Reuiew of Religions, dated March-April 1915).

"Any person who believes in Moses but does not believe in Christ, or believes in Christ but does not believe in Muhammad, or believes in Muhammad but does not believe in the promised Masih, is not only a Kafir, but a 'pakka' (confirmed) Kafir, and (he is) out of the fold of Islam." (Kalimatul Fasl, page 110, by Mirza Bashir Ahmad, M.A.)

"The Ahmadi movement bears the same relationship to Islam as Christianity bears to Judaism." (Muhammad Ali Lahori Qadiani cited from Mubahasah Rawalpindi, page 240).

"All such Muslims as did not swear allegiance to the promised Masih (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian), even though they did not hear the name of the promised Masih, are Kafir and debarred from the fold of Islam." (Aiena-e-Sadaqat, page 35, by Mirza Mahmud Ahmad Qadiani).

"It is incumbent upon us that we should not regard non-Ahmadis as Muslims, nor should we offer prayers behind them, because according to our belief they deny one of the prophets of Allah. This is a matter of faith None has any discretion in this." (Anwar-e-Khilafat, page 90, by Mahmud Ahmad Qadiani).

THE SO-CALLED QADIANI KALIMAH

It also became necessary in the Qadiani strategy to include the Qadiani Mirza in the meaning of the Qadiani Kalimah: Thus it is said:

"As a result of the birth of the promised Masih (the Qadiani Mirza) a difference has cropped up (in the meaning of the Kalimah). Before the birth of the promised Masih (the Qadiani Mirza) in the world as a prophet, the words Muhammad ur Rasul Allah) included in their meaning only such prophets as had preceded him; but after the incarnation of the promised Masih (the Qadiani Mirza) in the world as a prophet, one more prophet has been added to the meaning of Muhammad ur Rasul Allah. Therefore on account of the incarnation of the promised Masih the Kalimah, God forbid, does not become abolished; it rather shines more brightly. In short, the same Kalimah is (effective) even now for embracing Islam, with the only difference that the incarnation of the promised Masih (Mirza Qadiani) has added one more prophet to the meaning of Muhammad ur Rasul Allah". (Kalimatul Fasl, page 158, by Mirza Bashir Ahmad Qadiani).

In short, the Qadiani Religion has retained the same words of the Kalimah but the Qadiani belief has changed the meaning of the Kalimah. In the Kalimah of the Muslims Muhammad ur Rasul Allah means Muhammad of Arabia (SAW) but in the Qadiani Kalimah Muhammad ur Rasul Allah means Mirza Qadiani as Muhammad incarnate, reborn in the world as a prophet for the second time. Thus it is said:

"Moreover, even if we accept by supposing the impossible that the sacred name of the gracious Prophet has been included in the sacred Kalimah because he is the last of the Prophets, even then there is no harm and we do not need a new Kalimah because the promised Masih is not a separate entity from the gracious Prophet as he (Mirza) himself says: "My being is exactly the being of Muhammad ur Rasul Allah". Also, "One who discriminates between me and Mustafa has neither recognized me nor seen me". And the reason for this is Allah Almighty's promise that He would reincarnate "Khatam un Nabieen" in this world once more as a prophet as is evident from the verse "And others of them... Thus the promised Masih (Mirza of Qadian) is himself Muhammad ur Rasulullah, who has been incarnated in the world again to spread Islam. We do not, therefore, need any new Kalimah. Albeit, a new Kalimah would have been necessary, if some other person had been reincarnated instead of Muhammad ur Rasul Allah. So contemplate!" (Kalimatul Fasl, page 158).

QADIANI BELIEF: PROPHETHOOD OF MUHAMMAD STANDS ABROGATED AND HIS KALIMAH STANDS CANCELLED

A little thought on the above-cited passages makes it quite clear that not only do the Qadianis consider Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be a Prophet and Messenger (of Allah) but they also consider Mirza of Qadian a complete incarnation of Muhammad (SAW) and as such recite his (Mirza's) Kalimah. They consider as Kafirs all those who recite the Kalimah of Muhammad of Arabia (SAW). This proves that for the Qadianis the Kalimah of Muhammad of Arabia (SAW) stands cancelled.

If we look more closely into the issue we shall find that according to the Qadiani belief-like that of the Bahais - the period of the Prophethood and Apostleship of Muhammad of Arabia (SAW) has expired and it stands repealed for all practical purposes, because according to the Qadiani belief the basis of salvation lies in obeying the Qadiani Mirza only. So Mirza said:

"Say to them: if you love God then come and obey me so that God also may love you".
(Mirza Qadiani's "revelation as cited in Haqiqatul Wahi, Page 79/82, Lahore, 1952; Roohani Khazain. Vol. 22, p. 82. Also see pages 46, 62, 81, 182, 205, 277, 360, 363, 378, 395, 495, 630, 634, in Tazkirah, 2nd Edition).

"In Braheen-e-Ahmadia, God has called me by the name of Ibrahim, as He said: "This means: Salutation on Ibrahim (i.e. this humble man [Mirza]). We truly made friends with him and saved him from every sorrow. And O ye who follow, let the place of Ibrahim's footsteps be the place of your prayers. That is, obey completely so that you may attain salvation." (Arbaeen, Vol. 3, pp. 30-31; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 17, p. 420).

"As regards the assertion (verse from Quran regarding Ibraham) this is a verse of the holy Quran. Here it means: Perform your prayers and hold beliefs on the pattern of Ibrahim (i.e. Mirza Qadiani) who has been sent, and mould yourself on his model in every matter". (Arbaeen, Vol. 3, p. 31; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 17, p.42).

"Similar is the verse (same verse quoted above) which contains a hint that at a time when the Ummat-e-Muhammadia will become divided into many sects, then during the last era an Ibrahim (i.e. Mirza Qadiani) will be born and out of all the sects, the sect which follows this Ibrahim, (i.e. Mirza!), will be saved". (Arbaeen, Vol. 3, page 32; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 17, p. 4213.

"My teachings contain orders as well as prohibitions and renovation of important injunctions of the Shari'at. For this reason God has named my teachings and the 'wahi' (revelation) that comes to me as a 'boat. Thus see, God has declared my 'wahi', my teachings and allegiance with me to be Noah's Ark and the basis of salvation for all human beings. Let he who has eyes may see and he who has ears may hear." (Arbaeen, Vol. 4, footnote of page 6; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 17, p. 435).

Thus obedience to Mirza Qadiani's prophethood, teachings, 'wahi' and his renovated Shari'at is allegedly the only basis for salvation for all mankind. This only means, that the Shari'at of Muhammad of Arabia (SAW), his teachings and 'wahi" are no longer the basis of salvation. In other words, Mirza's incarnation has rendered all these useless, suspended and abolished!

THE PRE MIRZA ISLAM IS THE 'DEAD RELIGION

The above-cited quotations confirm beyond a shadow of doubt that in the opinion of the Qadianis, lslam without the Qadiani Mirza is dead. So it is said:

"Probably in the year 1906, at the proposal of Khwaja Kamaluddin, Moulvi Muhammad Ali entered into an agreement with the Editor of Akhbar-e-Watan to the effect that the Review of Religions would publish no articles about the (Qadiani) sect; it would only publish general articles on Islam and the Editor of the Watan would propagate in his paper for the assistance of the Journal, Review of Religions. The promised Masih disapproved this proposal and it was strongly opposed by the Jamaat also. Hazrat Sahib said: 'Will you present dead Islam before the world by excluding me?"
(Zikr-e-Habib by Mufti Muhammad Sadiq Qadiani page 146, First Edition, Qadian).

"We believe that a religion which does not have the chain of prophethood (as in Islam-- Compiler) is a dead religion. We call the religions of the Jews, the Christians and the Hindus dead only because now there are no prophets in them. If this were the position in Islam too, we would be no more than mere story-tellers. Why do we regard it superior to other religions? It must have some distinction". (Malfoozat-e-Mirza, Vol. 10, page 127).

"During the lifetime of the promised Masih (Mirza Qadiani), at the proposal of Moulvi Muhammad Ali and Khwaj a Kamaluddin, the Editor of Akhbar-e-Watan started a fund-collecting scheme in 1905 for the purpose of sending copies of the Review of Religions to foreign countries, on the condition that it should not contain the name of the promised Masih (Mirza Qadiani). But 'hazrate aqdas' (Mirza Qadiani) rejected this proposal saying: Will you present dead Islam by excluding me?' Thereupon, the Editor Watan announced the closure of this fund-collecting scheme".
(Al-Fazl, Qadian, Vol. 16, No. 32, dated 19th October, 1928, as cited in Qadiani Mazhab, pages 461-462).

QADIANIS DENOUNCE ISLAM AS THE 'CURSED, SATANIC AND CONTEMIBLE RELIGION

According to the Qadiani belief, the Religion of Islam, without the prophet hood of Mirza Qadiani, is only a 'collection of tales', it is a 'cursed, satanic and contemptible religion'.

"That religion is no religion and that prophet is no prophet by following whom a man does not come so close to God as to be honoured with divine conversation (i.e. Prophethood - Compiler). That religion is cursed and contemptible which teaches that human progress depends only on a few narrated anecdotes (i.e. the Shari'at-e-Muhammadia which is narrated from the holy Prophet (SAW) - Compiler) and that the 'wahi' has lagged behind instead of going ahead ........ Hence such a religion deserves to be called satanic rather than divine." (i.e. Islam of the holy Prophet (SAW) is, God forbid, Satanic - Translator). (Zamima-e-Braheen-e-Ahmadia, Part V, pages 138-139; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 21, p. 306).

QADIANI ARROGANCE

"How absurd and false it is to believe that after the holy Prophet (SAW) the door of the divine 'wahi' has been closed for ever and there i8 no hope of it in the future till the Day of Resurrection - only worship tales. Can a religion having no direct trace of Almighty Allah be called a religion? I say, by Almighty God, that in this age there is no one more disgusted than myself with such a religion. (There is no doubt about this.- Compiler). I name such a religion as satanic religion, not divine (religion)". (Zamima-e-Braheen-e-Ahmadia, Part V, page 183; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 21, p. 354).

The above-cited incontrovertible proofs indicate beyond the slightest doubt that Qadianism is an entirely different religion from Islam. The reality of the Qadiani religion is that if you accept the Qadiani Mirza as Prophet then it is all right, otherwise the Religion of Islam is abused as being dead, cursed, satanic and contemptible, and the Prophethood and Apostleship of Muhammad (SAW) too is denied. May not Almighty Allah deprive anyone of Wisdom and Faith!

by Maulana Muhammad Yusuf Ludhianvi

Difference between Qadianis and Muslims

I want to tell you briefly how Qadianis differ from other 'Kafirs'. But before Ido so, I shall answer a question which is in the minds of some of the Ummah

THE QUESTION (In 3 Parts):

Firstly: Why is it that an organization called Aalami Majlise Tahaffuze Khatme Nubuwwat has been set up, specifically aiming to pursue Qadianis to whichever part of the world they go and expose them by Allah's help and with the cooperation of Muslim brethren when there are other non- Muslims also in the world, such as Jews, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, etc?

Secondly: Why is there no such organization against any other 'Kafir' community?

Thirdly: What was the reason for such stalwarts of Islam as Imam-ul'asr Muhammad Anwar Shah Kashmiri, Sheikh-ul-Islam Maulana Muhammad Yusuf Binnori, Ameer-e-Shariat Ataullah Shah Bukhari, and Hazrate Aqdas Maulana Mufti Mahmood, (Allah's mercy on all of them), attached so much importance to counter the 'Kufr' of Qadianis that it was considered necessary to estab- lish an organization, on an international level, namely Aalami Majlis-e-Tahaffuz-e-Khatme Nubuwwat?

ANSWER:

Before I answer, I sum up the question which in short is: What distinguishes a Qadiani from other Non-Muslims?

First I lay before you an example:

You know that alchol is prohibited in Shari'at. Drinking alchol, manufacturing and selling it are all prohibited, i.e., 'Ha ram.' Similarly, you know that a Pig is filthy and impure. Selling its meat which is called pork and its eating, giving or conveying are absolute prohibitions, i.e., 'Harame Mutlaq.' Everyone is aware of these precepts.

Now imagine a situation: A man sells alchol and calls it alchol. Another man also sells alchol but pastes a label of 'Zam-Zam' on the bottle, i.e., he is selling alchol under the name of 'Zam-Zam'. Both persons are criminals but who is a greater criminal? You know the answer.

Take another example: There is a butcher who is selling pork. He sells it as such. Clearly he says this is pork. Whosoever wants to buy may buy it. Certainly he is a criminal in Shariat for selling pork. Against this is a person who, sells pork but calls it mutton. Now both those persons have committed a crime in Islamic Law; but sky-high is the difference in the nature of the offence between the two. One sells 'Unlawful,' i.e., 'Haram' calling it 'Unlawful,' Haram. The other sells 'Unlawful' Haram, calling it 'Lawful', i.e. 'Halal.' Anybody, unawares, could fall into his trap and eat 'Unlawful-Haram' pork thinking it to be 'Lawful-Halal' mutton. Thus the difference between a butcher selling pork as mutton and a butcher selling pork as pork is precisely the difference between a Qadiani and other Non-Muslim such as Jew, Christian and Hindu, etc. 'Kufr' is 'Kufr' in both cases because it is negation of Islam. But 'Kafirs' of the world do not put label of Islam on their 'Kufr' and do not propagate their 'Kufr' as Islam. A Qadiani, on the other hand, puts a label of Islam on his 'Kufr' and deceives Muslims by saying this is Islam.

CATEGORIES OF 'KAFIRS'

So far I have spoken to you in general terms. I shall explain the theology.

'Kufr' is of several kinds but three are very obvious:

First: The 'Kafir' who is undoubtedly a 'Kafir.

Second: That 'Kafir' who is 'Kafir' from inside but pretends as Muslim from outside.

Third: That 'Kafir',who tries to label his 'Kufr' as Islam

Category No. 1:

Jews, Christians, Hindus, etc., are unmistakenly and undoubtely Kaffirs. The Polytheist (mushrikeen) of pre-Islamic Mecca were openly included in this category. All of them are openly Kaffirs.

Category No. 2:

In the second category are Hypocrites (munafiqueen) who recite the Kalimah with the tongue but hide Kufr in their hearts. In their case Allah, the Exalted, has proclaimed:

When they (hypocrites) come to thee, they say: "We believe": but in fact they enter with a mind against Faith, and they go out with the same but Allah knoweth fully all that they hide. (HQ 5.61)

Hazrat Imam Shafai, (Allah's mercy on him) used to say about Ibrahim bin Ulayya: "I am his opponent, so much so, that I shall oppose him even if he recites the Kalimah Tayyiba"

It means that some persons are so compulsive liars that they lie even in 'Kalimah Tayyiba' because their 'Kalimah' is a show of falsehood.

Category No. 3:

The 'Kufr' of the third category exceeds the 'Kufr' of the second category because their offence is that they call their 'Kufr' as Islam. They present pure 'Kufr' in the nomenclature of Islam by twisting the verses of the holy Quran, the sacred 'Ahadith' of the Prophet (SAW), the statements of his Companions and sayings of revered saints in order to prove their 'Kufr' as Islam. Such men are called zindiq (Dualist-infidels) in Shari'at terminology.

To sum up, the three categories are Unbelievers; Kafir); Hypocrites: (Munafiq); and Dualist- lnfidel: (Zindiq).

'Kafir' (Unbeliever) is a person who does not believe in Allah and the Prophet neither outwardly nor inwardly. 'Munafiq' (Hypo crit) is a person who hides 'Kufr' in his heart and his recitation of 'Kalimah' is false. He is a pretender. 'Zindiq' (Dualist-Infidel) is a person who gilt-edges, his 'Kufr' with the gold of Islam and tries to present it as real Islam.

WHO IS AN APOSTATE

An apostate (Murtad) is a person who abandons Islam. A precept should be understood here which is recorded in the books. All the four schools of 'Fiqah' unanimously agree that in case of an apostate (Murtad), Shari'at allows him three days to enable him to remove his doubts. All possible efforts should be made to clarify his doubts. If he understands and re-enters Islamic fold, well and good; otherwise he shouk~ be got rid off. This precept is known as 'killing of apostate' (Qatl-e-Murtad). None of the Imams differs on this issue. Laws of all civilised countries and governments award death punishment to rebels. As apostate is a rebel of Islam, therefore apostasy (Irtidad) is punishable with death.

CONCESSION OF SHARI'AT FOR APOSTATE

Islamic Shari'at offers a concession to its rebels while laws of the world do not do so. They must put their traitors to death even if they beg for mercy after their arrest and award of sentance.

Take the example of a rebel of any modern government. He may repent, beg to be excused or vouch for good behaviour a hundred times, assuring the government that in future he will never resort to revolt; still he will not be heard. The capital sentence will be executed on him. His repentance will be unacceptable. At no cost will he be excused.

But Islamic Shari'at Law gives a concession to its rebel. The Apostate (Murtad) is allowed three days to think over. He is advised to withdraw and renounce his apostatic stance. If he assures for future and is repentant, he is not punished. In spite of this humane concession afforded by Shari'at, Non-Muslims criticise the Islamic punishment. It is a matter of surprise that there are no objections to the hanging of a person when caught in conspiracy, say for toppling the lawful Govern- ments of the American President or the Russian President or the Pakistani President. Conspirators are sentenced to death and no law of any civlised court disagrees with this.

Why do then people disapprove of punishing a person who rebels against Allah's Prophets and say: Do not put him to death! Islam does concede three days' grace to enable the apostate to remove his doubts and come back into the Islamic fold. If he begs for mercy or repents, Shari'at grants him his life back. But if he is adamant and refuses to renounce his apostasy then Allah's sacred soil must be cleaned of his foul existence.

APOSTASY IS A DEADLY DISEASE OF MILLAT: WHY?

It is so because it takes the form of a carbuncle which stinks. If a malignant growth (Allah forbid) appears on some part of human body, doctors advise its amputation. Who would call this a tyranny over the patient? Rather a favour to him! By this removal the sound parts of the body are saved from septic poisoning, else death would be certain. Therefore it is wise to cut away the diseased part to protect the healthy part.

In the same way apostasy is a carbuncle of Islamic Mill at. The malignant part, i.e., the 'Murtad,' despite preaching does not retrace his steps. Therefore, cancerous malignancy must necessarily be removed otherwise his poison will gradually travel inside the entire physiology of the Islamic Millat. This indeed is the unanimous verdict of the four Imams, and theologians and doctors of Shari'at law. Wisdom and sagacity demands it. The safety of Millat lies in it.

ORDER OF SHARIAT FOR DUALIST - INFIDEL: ZINDIQ

A dualist-infidel is worse than an apostate, because he is bent upon presenting his 'Kufr' as Islam. Imam Shafai and Imam Ahmad, in their well-known sayings, were pleased to ordain that a dualist-infidel (Zindiq) is governed by the same orders as an apostate (Murtad); that is, afford him a chance first, give him time to repent and permit him to return to the Islamic fold. If within three days he does so, leave him unscathed, otherwise it is obligatory to award him capital sentence.

VIEWS OF IMAM MALIK:

Imam Malik, (Allah's blessing on him), goes one step forward to say:

"I will not accept the penitence of a Dualist- Infidel".

By this he means to say that if a person guises his 'Kufr' with Islam and does not repent, when caught in the act, then, (leaving it to Allah whether or not He accepts his penitence), we shall certainly promulgate Allah's Shari'at on him, i.e., shall pronounce capital punishment for him. This is a crime which is similar to adultery in which a person may be penitent (Taaib) for future but his penitence will not save him from death. Therefore, he will be punished under all circumstances. Similarly, hands are to be amputated for stealing. A thief, on arrest, may offer penitence ('Tauba') but his offence will not go unpunished. It is in this light that Imam Malik says:

"I will not accept the penitence of a Dualist Infidel." Capital punishment will certainly be given to him, although he may be penitent ('Taaib') a hundred times.

Similar sayings are on record from Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Ahmad bin Hambal, (Allah's blessing on them.) In books of 'Fiqah' such as 'Durr-e-Mukhtar' and 'Shami' and some others, it is written that if a Dualist-Infidel offers penitence ('Tauba') of his own free will, his penitence will be accepted without capital penalty, provided no one came to know of his offence. Similarly, he will be excused from punishment if he became penitent of his own free will, on Allah's guidance. Therefore, if a Qadiani renounces his 'Qadianism' on his own and offers penitence ('Tauba') then he will be excused. On the contrary, if he offers penitence ('Tauba') after arrest then there will be no excuse, irrespective of his repentance even a hundred times.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN APOSTATE AND DUALIST - INFIDEL:

Shari'at enjoins upon us to preach to the apostate. If he as a result of preaching, undertakes penitence ('Tauba'), he will save himself from capital punishment but this does not apply to a dualist-infidel. There is another saying from Imam Malik and Imam Abu Hanifa, and one from Imam Ahmad, (Allah's blessings on them all), that penitence ('Tauba') of a dualist-infidel is not acceptable because he has committed the crime of dualist infidelity (Zindaqa), i.e., he applied false coating of Islam over his 'Kufr'

I repeat, he has sold pork as mutton and wine as 'Zam-Zam.' This is a crime which is not excusable and is certainly punishable with capital sentence.

QADIANIS' COVENANT OF 'KUFR'

My purpose here is not to tell you why Qadianis are 'Kafirs.' What I do wish to tell you is that in spite of their being diehard 'Kafirs' they present their 'Kufr' with the label of 'Islam'. Take the case of our Kalimah Tayyiba.

They do not believe in our 'Kalimah'. How can they claim to be Muslims? Please understand this clearly that a person who doubts in their being a 'Kafir' is not a Muslim. They pretend to be Muslims and say, "We are Musalman, we are only a sect of Islam called Jamat-e-Ahmadiya'.' But they are liars. They have established their colony near London and have named it "Islamabad" and behave as protagonists of Islam. When they come across a Muslim they deceive him and tell him "You see, we offer 'Namaz', keep fasts, do this and do that and we consider Hazrat Muhammad (SAW), as 'Khatam un Nabieen', i.e., the last of the Prophets." They play fraud on simple ignorant Muslims and assure them that every person who enters their 'Jamaat' has got to agree to one condition of their Charter of Loyalty which reads as follows:

"I acknowledge Hazrat Muhammad as 'Khatam un Nabieen' with all sincerety of my heart.

By this covenant they deceive poor simple Muslims.

WHY QADIANS ARE DUALISIT - INFIDELS (ZINDIQ)

They are so for the simple reason that they pour Islam into their mould of 'Kufr' and label urine as 'Zam-Zam' and dog's carrion as 'Halal'. The whole world knows that Allah's Prophet Mu- hammad (SAW) was the last of the Prophets. This Islamic doctrine of finality of prophet hood is a definite certainty. On the occasion of his farewell Haj, the Prophet declared:

"O peoplel I am the last prophet and you are the last Ummat." Besides, there are more than two hundred 'Ahadith' in which the Prophet (SAW), himself explained about the finality of Prophethood ('Khatm e Nubuwwat'). In different ways and through different expressions he was pleased to say that there will be no prophet after him and that nobody will be given prophethood after him..........(SAW)

MEANING OF FINAL PROPHETHOOD

It does not mean that any previous prophet is not alive. It simply means that if for the sake of argument all the previous prophets supposedly come in the world in the times of our Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and become his servants, even then our Prophet (SW) shall continue to be the last prophet since nobody has been awarded prophethood after him. The list of the blessed prophets in the manifest of the All-Knowing Allah carried his exhalted name in the last. With his arrival, the list of the holy prophets became complete.

MEANING OF 'LAST OF CHILDREN AND 'LAST OF PROPHETS'

A child who is born last in a family is called their youngest off-spring. He is the final child and none is born after him. It does not mean that he is the last to survive among his brothers. Of course, it sometimes happens that he is born last but dies earlier. Then the father says: this child who died was my last one.

In the same way, the last prophet ('Khatam un Nabieen') means no prophet after him; no person shall wear the crown of prophethood or sit on the throne of prophethood after Muhammad (SAW) Those prophets who were sent down earlier are certainly within our Faith but our Prophet (SAW) is the last one. None else will wear the prophetic mantle of honour after him; nor will the Ummat put faith in any such pretender.

QADIANIS HAVE ALTERED MEANING OF 'KHATAM UN NABIEEN'

Qadianis say that the epithet of 'Khatam un Nabieen' does not mean that our Prophet is the last of the Prophets, and that there shall be no prophet after him.In their opinion it means that our Prophet Muhammad (SAW) will certify future prophets with his seal, i.e., on whomsoever he will stamp, that person shall become a prophet. What a nonsense ! Infourteen hundred years only one person, namely Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian has been stamped as prophet and he too a cock-eyed man! The seal has authenticated a one-eyed 'Dajjal' from Qadian!

I repeat that the term 'Khatam un Nabieen means that our Prophet Muhammad (SAW) is the last prophet. All new entries have been stopped. They have been sealed. No prophet will come after him. It is like an envelope which has been closed by sealing it. 'Khatam' means sealing. Therefore, the term 'Khatam un Nabieen' means that the list of the prophets is completed and the seal has been placed on it. Neither a fresh entry is possible nor will there be any removal from that list.

But the Qadianis have changed the meaning of 'Khatam un Nabieen' to mean that our Prophet grants certificates of prophethood to persons. In other words, Allah, who was previously sending down prophets, has now transferred this department to Prophet Muhammad (SAW) for stamp- ing people and making them prophets!!

This is called infidelity ('Zindaqa'). In this way, they pronounce the name of Islam for meeting their nefarious designs and twist the meaning of verses of the holy Quran to suit their agnostic beliefs. That is why I say they sell pork and dog's carrion as 'Halal' meat and produce liquor under the holy label of 'Zam-Zam.'

By Allah, I would not have cared one bit for them if they had plainly said: "We are not Muslims and Islam is not our religion.

LOOK AT THE 'BAHAI' RELIGION

This is also a religion of the world. The Bahais believe in Bahaullah of Iran as their prophet. This group still exists. We call them 'Kafir' and they have also declared that they have nothing to do with Islam. Well, there ends the matter.

But these Qadianis call their 'Kufr' as Islam and in this way deceive Muslims. It is for this reason that they are dualist-infidels (Zindiq) and not simply Non- muslims. Remember! A Muslim can be at peace with a non-Muslim but never with a dualist-infidel ('zindiq') or apostate ('Murtad').

THREE QUESTIONS TO QADIANIS

Who has allowed you to:

2) Cancel the Kalimah of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and adopt the Kalimah of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad?

3) Call the so-called 'Wahi' of Mirza Ghulan. Ahmad as the basis of salvation in place of the true 'Wahi' of Prophet Muhammad (SAW)?

You impudently declare yourselves Muslims and call us 'Kafirs'. I quote from your Mirza Bashir Ahmad Qadiani's Kalimatul Fasl, p.110:
"Every person who believes in Moosa but does not believe in Isa or believes in Isa and does not believe in Muhammad or believes in Muhammad but does not believe in the promised Masih (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad), (such a person) is not only an Unbeliever ( a Kafir ) but a thorough Unbeliever ("Pakka Kafir') and an outcast from the Islamic fold".

QADIANI KALIMAH

The Qadianis claim that Prophet Muhammad was destined to come down into the world two times, first in Makkah and this prophethood lasted 1300 years, and secondly in Qadian, at the start of fourteenth Hijra in the incarnation of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Therefore in their opinion, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is the reincarnation of Muhammad ur Rasulullah and consequently the Qadianis think of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as Muhammad ur Rasulullah in their minds when reciting the Kalima-e-Tayyiba. This is veiled Kufr'.

I quote again Mirza Bashir Ahmad Qadiani from his Al Fasl, p.l58:
"The promised Masih (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) iS Muhammad ur Rasulullah himself who was reincarnated in the world for propagation of Islam. erefore, we do not need a new Kalimah. Yes, if somebody else would have reborn instead of Muhammad ur Rasulullah then this need (to have a new Kalimah) would have arisen"

From the above it is evident that for the Qadianis La ilaha ill Allah Muhammad ur Rasulullah' means 'La ilaha ill Allah Mirza Rasulullah' who (Muhammad ur Rasulullah) has been reincarnated in Qadian. (Allah protect us from this sacrilege) The Qadianis believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani is Prophet Muhammad incarnate. Mirza Bashir Ahmad Qadiani acknowledges that for the Qadianis Mirza himself is Muhammad ur Rasulullah and that they recite the Kalimah believing Mirza to be Muhammad ur Rasulullah. Therefore they do not need to construct a new Kalimah. However we say that Mirza was not Muhammad ur Rasulullah incarnate; rather Mirza was Devil incarnate!

DO PEOPLE KNOW THAT

The Qadianis fabricated:

1. a different Prophet
2. a different Quran (named "Tazkirah", which has the same status in the eyes of Qadianis as is accorded to Torah, Zabur, Injeel and Quran by the Muslims).
3. a different Kalimah
4. a different Shari'at
5. a different Ummat

How with all these very basic differences the Qadianis have the cheek to tell the world that they are Muslims and that their religion is Islam! They are Dualist-Infidels indeed. Allah protect us from their calumny and cunning!

NONSENSE

I ask Qadianis: You call us 'Kafirs'. Why? What tenets of 'Deen' of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) have we refused to accept? Just because of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's birth all the Muslims of the world have become 'Kafirs'! Before his birth, our 'Deen' was alright as Islam and we were Muslims. After his creation our 'Deen' has become 'Kufr' and we have become 'Kafirs' ! ! Allah protect us from the Qadianis' snare! Can there be any more nonsense to compare with?

CRIMES OF MIRZA GHULAM AHMAD OF QADIAN

He has committed these heinous crimes:

a . Claimed Prophethood
b. Started a new religion
c. Called his followers Muslims
d. Called followers of Muhammad as 'Kafirs'.

Please tell me, if any Jew, Christian, Hindu, Sikh, etc., has ever committed this crime. Therefore I say that the Qadianis are 'Kafirs' of the highest magnitude and of the worst degree ever born.

CONCESSIONAL TREATMENT OF QADIANIS BY MUSLIMS

By Law of Shari'at, they should be awarded capital sentence because they are Dualist-infidels ('Zindiq'), calling Islam 'Kufr' and 'Kufr' Islam. If they are masquerading as Muslims on the face of the globe, it is because they have not been sentenced. Despite this concession, they proclaim that they are being tyrannized in Pakistan. Truly speaking, they are taking undue advantage of our politeness and the Pakistan Government is treating them most kindly which they do not deserve. The Government has not placed any restriction on the performance of their religious rites. They have been only told to stop calling the religion of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) as 'Kufr' and to stop calling their Qadiani religion as Islam; no more restriction than this.

Otherwise, remember! The Law of Shari'at ordains to award them capital sentence. But the government of Pakistan has given them a ccncession. The Qadianis occupy high posts and offices in Government administration and public services. In spite of these concessions, they appeal to the United Nations and to the Courts of Jews and Christians, clamouring that the Pakistan Go- vernment has snatched their rights. What were their rights which have been snatched? What wrong has been done to them? Only they have been told that Kalimah Tayyiba is the Kalimah of Islam.

HOW CAN THE QADIANIS:

a) be permitted to paste bottles of liquor with labels of 'Zam-Zam'?
b) be allowed to sell pig's pork and dog's carrion as 'Halal' meat?
c) be allowed to call our Islam as 'Kufr'?
d) be a]lowed to present the religion of cock- eyed Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as Islam?

DISGRACE

The pronouncement of just Kalimah Tayyiba from the mouth of these hypocrites (i.e. th